Theory of Change: What is it and How to Develop it
December 16, 2020
What determines the Sample Size for Cross-Sectional Surveys?
January 6, 2021
0

How to ask the Right Evaluation Questions? OECD-DAC criteria helps!

The term evaluation is synonymous with research in its broadest sense; and thus, the research questions posed and the methods used are as varied as social sciences, humanities, and natural sciences fields can be! However, many often stumble at the first step – asking the “right evaluation questions”.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development – Development Assistance Committee (OECD-DAC) has developed six evaluation criteria. These criteria offer a flexible yet “guided” framework to ensure at least the right evaluation questions are asked. Evaluating all six evaluation criteria might not be suitable for every program. Therefore, decisions on:
(a) which criteria to use, and
(b) what questions to ask
…must be based on the context and purpose of the program.

 

The Right Evaluation Questions that can be asked under the OECD-DAC Criteria

Below, I explain which questions can be asked under the OECD-DAC criteria.

Relevance

Here, we assess the situation and needs of the programme population and evaluate whether the programme was suitably designed and targeted for maximizing benefit. So, the questions to ask are:

  • Have we identified the right target population for an intervention?
  • Is the intervention indeed a right one for the given population?
  • Is/was the programme the best among other alternatives to address the development needs?

 

Coherence

Here, we recognize, appreciate, and assess a “causal package” that must exist for delivering impacts. A programme rarely delivers impacts on its own and must do so under the context of or in collaboration with other programs, government policies, communities’ capacity. The questions to ask include”

  • Does the program create duplication of efforts?
  • Does it undermine or supplement the effects of any existing programs or policies?
  • Can programme succeed/fail if other programmes or support-system falters?

 

Effectiveness

This criterion is often confused with the impact criteria because sometimes “effect and impacts” are used as synonyms. Put simply, this criterion evaluates whether the program delivered the planned or committed outcomes; and does not evaluate higher-order, intended, or unintended impacts. The questions explored under this criterion can be:

  • Can/did the program meet stated objectives or outcomes?
  • Are there any unintended outcomes of the program?
  • Did the program deliver the most “relevant” objectives?
  • What is the relative importance of programme results?

Efficiency

Here, we evaluate if the program should or did result in maximum benefits in an economic and timely manner. It is not a financial and human resource audit but an inquiry into whether inputs are converted to outputs in the most efficient way. Some examples of questions to ask are:

  • What technology and systems did the programme use to ensure efficiency?
  • Is/was there any other implementation strategy which was more efficient?
  • How does cost-effectiveness of the programme compare with other programmes?
  • Did the programme leverage other programmes working in the area? (here, this criterion can overlap with the coherence criterion)

 

Impact

Here, we evaluate the extent to which the programme will/has delivered higher-level outcomes (known as impacts). (Read our blog that explains the difference between impact evaluation, impact assessment and programme evaluation). Proving causality is not a prime intent of impact assessments but evaluating the theory of change is. Impact assessment can be done before the programme begins and can assess unintended or negative outcomes. Some example questions are:

  • What is the attributable impact of the programme on reducing maternal mortality? (a causal impact evaluation question)
  • Has the programme negatively affected non-beneficiaries? (an example of seeking out unintended negative impact)
  • In what ways did the program transform the lives of the beneficiaries? (open-ended inquiry)

 

Sustainability

Here, we assess whether the programme has created systems and capacities to sustain the program benefits in future once the implementers exit. The potential for sustainability is evaluated from social, economic, financial, environmental, and institutional perspectives. The questions can include:

  • Is there capacity and intent in the community to continue the programme activities on their own?
  • Is there any post-project monitoring system developed to track slippage and take corrective action?

 

I hope the list above can help you get started on asking the “right” evaluation questions.

You can also schedule a free micro-consulting to get any clarity on evaluation methods.

Related posts

July 30, 2021

What is Feeder Separation and why should we care?

Read more
July 16, 2021

Improving Results-Based Monitoring in NGOs and CSR Organizations

Read more
June 24, 2021

Cost Benefit Analysis of Swachh Bharat Abhiyan – Joint study with UNICEF

Read more

As a Research Assistant, Alron provides support on projects, proposals, data analysis, ideation. He has over two years of experience in MIS, economic analyses, and policy research writing. He is passionate about migration-refugee crisis, decoding and mitigating disinformation mechanisms, and has written extensively on these topics, among others.

Alron holds a bachelor’s in economics from the University of Mumbai and is currently pursuing a Diploma in International Affairs.

As a Research Assistant, Alron provides support on projects, proposals, data analysis, ideation. He has over two years of experience in MIS, economic analyses, and policy research writing. He is passionate about migration-refugee crisis, decoding and mitigating disinformation mechanisms, and has written extensively on these topics, among others.

Alron holds a bachelor’s in economics from the University of Mumbai and is currently pursuing a Diploma in International Affairs.

Hrishikesh works as a Research Assistant at NEERMAN where he applies his skills to the development of impact assessment. Apart from this, he volunteers his time by working for various projects and activities associated with the Rotaract.

He holds a Master's degree in Social Work from the University of Mumbai.

Anshuman manages our survey research and data division. He leads a critical position that ensures researchers need for quality data are met on time and within budget.

He has an MPhil in Population Studies from IIPS, Mumbai and a Master’s degree in Population Education and Rural Development from the University of Lucknow. Prior to joining NEERMAN, he worked with UNICEF (UP) and IIPS.

Rupam is working as a Senior Research Associate at NEERMAN. She has over 4 years of work experience in social/ development sector. Her area of interest is in domains like population and development, maternal and child nutrition, education, reproductive and child health, gender issues, transgender study etc. She holds her Master's degree in Population Studies from International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS, Mumbai) and Bachelor’s from University of Delhi.

Anil has more than 25 years of experience in the area of data management and analysis. Previously he has worked with Nielsen India Pvt. Ltd. He is adept in facilitating operations for projects using CSPro (Version 7.6) Data Entry package and analysis of data using statistical package for social science (SPSS). He has proven ability in maintaining large databases and conducting field training of CAPI related aspects.

Free or highly subsidized power for farm irrigation has been a cornerstone of India’s agricultural policy since the 1970s, but it also results in high subsidies, technical and commercial losses, and ultimately poor service to the consumers.  Government of India is investing billions to separate feeders that supply power to farmers from other consumers for better regulation, measurement and quality of supply. However, no robust evidence was available on whether and how these infrastructure improvements benefit the end consumers.  NEERMAN in partnership with Asian Development Bank and Central Discom Madhya Pradesh undertook an impact evaluation of the Feeder Separation Project in Madhya Pradesh. The study proved that feeder separation benefit farm and non-farm consumers by decreasing power theft, increasing coverage of electrical connections, reducing irrigation, and reducing the use of diesel.

Read the study results in this published manuscript (paid access) or the summary in our blogs.

In a partnership between UC Berkeley, UCSF, IFPRI and NEERMAN – one of the largest mHealth programmes in the world with support from the World Bank, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Government of India. The study included multiple types of evaluations at multiple points in time. In addition to a strong research role from proposal to publication stages, NEERMAN also collected data from over 800 villages in Madhya Pradesh and Bihar and 6000+ mother-child dyads, 1500+ community workers for the evaluation and several interim surveys for process evaluation using qualitative and quantitative research methods. The study identified what mHealth can and cannot do and resulted in programmatic and policy decisions at national level about revamping the technology for nutrition programmes.

The study is published in a peer-reviewed journal – British Medical Journal (BMJ).

 

NEERMAN in collaboration with UNICEF and Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation undertook a CBA of the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan. Data came from household surveys from twelve Indian states that once contributed to over 90 per cent of open defecation in India. The time and money spent by households in building and maintaining toilets were monetised. Along with this, the government’s investments in subsidies and campaign activities were also costed out. Reductions in medical costs and mortality associated with diarrheal diseases, productive time saved from fewer diarrhoea cases and accessing outside defecation and an increase in the property value of having a toilet were all monetized as benefits. The findings of this study were presented to a high-power committee led by the chief economic advisor of India and used by the PMO and other prominent ministers as proof of the success of SBM.

The study findings are also published in the World Development Journal.

NEERMAN was the Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning partner for UNICEF’s Adolescents Empowerment Programme for a period of three years between 2016-2019. Under the partnership, NEERMAN collaborated in developing the monitoring-evaluation-learning framework and plans for the national programme, collected multiple rounds of monitoring surveys across four programme states, developed android and multilingual quarterly process motoring systems for partner NGOs of UNICEF. Further, we managed data from multiple sources and analysed it for actionable inputs, conducted secondary data analysis to generate policy insights, participated in national and state workshops as a technical resource agency and advisors, helped several state offices develop monitoring systems and design evaluations in the child protection sector.

Primer on Non-Research aspects of Research in India

This primer is specially written for international researchers, universities and Institutes working or want to work in India.
The primer gives an overview of taxation, visa, insurance, ethics, and contracting and funding research in India. We have also included suggestions and tips to help avoid costly mistakes international researchers often make.

Non Research Aspects of Research in India

WEBINAR

Randomised Controlled Trial – Concepts, Designs, and Implementation

Dr. Sumeet Patil - Founder and Research Director at NEERMAN - has covered the following key points:
▪️ The concept of 'causality' and why RCTs are theoretically best suited to prove causality
▪️ Differences in random sampling and randomization
▪️ Various design options for RCTs in social sciences
▪️ Ethics of RCTs
▪️ Practical insights into the planning and management of RCTs.

WEBINAR

Relevance of Evaluation in Developmental Change

In this video, Dr Milindo Chakrabarti - a Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist, and a Professor and Associate Dean at Jindal School Of Government and Public Policy - has covered the following key points:
▪️ What is evaluation?
▪️ Why evaluation matters?
▪️ How evaluation contributes to developmental change?

This video will also clarify your doubts about:
▪️ The concept of evaluation and why their importance is magnifying each passing day
▪️ How is evaluation different from monitoring
▪️ When and why should you use evaluations
▪️ Practical insights into how evaluations contribute to the society

    Thank you for your interest. Please share a few details before you get access.

       

      Pritesh is the backbone of the data processing and analytics division at NEERMAN and is responsible for data reporting, CAPI Design, STATE and ODK work in close collaboration with the Senior Data Manager. He also manages teams of assistants for data processing and QAQC. Pritesh holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Commerce from the University of Mumbai.

      Vishal contributes to every phase of the project life cycle — from design, implementation, to report-making. With his sharp analytical skills and background in Econometrics, he regularly conducts data analysis on Excel and STATA. He has previously worked on a Health Impact Evaluation project and successfully carried out cost-effectiveness analyses using tools like Impact2 and LiST.

      Vishal has a Master’s degree in Public Policy from the Jindal School of Government and Public Policy, OP Jindal Global University and a Bachelor’s in Computer Science and Engineering from the Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal University.

      Simran collaborates with the internal team on research frameworks, CAPI and proposal development.

      Simran has completed a Bachelor’s degree in Economics from KC College, University of Mumbai, and a Master’s degree, also in Economics, from the Mumbai School of Economics and Public Policy, University of Mumbai. After post-graduation, Simran has worked on a project on digital financial Inclusion for migrants, on the Interstate Migrant Policy Index (IMPEX 2019), and in behavioural sciences.

      Varsha contributes her quantitative skills as a Research Associate at NEERMAN and works on developing impact assessment and evaluation frameworks. She holds a Bachelor’s degree in Economics and a Master’s in Applied Social Psychology from the Royal Holloway, University of London. Prior to joining NEERMAN, she worked on impact assessment projects in the education sector.

      As a Research Associate at NEERMAN, Debangana collaborates with our partners on projects focusing on qualitative data analysis, process evaluation and documentation. She is also a researcher-in-residence at our Assam field research office.

      Debangana did her Bachelor's in Sociology from the Lady Shri Ram College for Women and has a Master's in Sociology from Jamia Millia Islamia University. Previously, she has worked at a non-profit focusing on spreading awareness about menstruation and related topics.

      Moushumi Maiti is part of the Research Project management team and is primarily involved in efficient implementation of projects. She has over 6 years of work experience in project implementation, policy research, planning and execution in domains like education, early childhood nutrition, gender and women's issues, disability, and child rights. Moushumi has a double Master's degree in Management from the K J Somaiya Institute of Management Sciences and in Social Work from the Delhi School of Social Work.

      Lancy leads the Operations and Administration Division at NEERMAN. She is responsible for overseeing HR, contracting, regulatory compliance, finance, and taxation.

      Lancy holds a PG Diploma in Finance and a Master’s degree in Commerce, both from the University of Mumbai.

      Suresh heads the field survey and data division at NEERMAN and is responsible for the quality of measurements and data collection. He has more than 20 years of extensive experience in operations and leadership in marketing research. He has overseen both quantitative and qualitative studies during this time.

      Suresh has a Bachelor’s degree in Commerce from the University of Mumbai and has held leadership positions in survey agencies such as Milward Brown, GfK, and TNS.

      Amit heads the data processing and analytics group at NEERMAN and is responsible for developing android apps for surveys, dashboard visualizations and analyses, CSPro data entry systems, developing monitoring systems using SaaS platforms, quality audits of primary data, and processing of survey data for further analysis.

      Amit holds a Diploma in Marketing Management from the Welingkar Institute of Management Development and Research, Mumbai, a Diploma in Population Studies from the Indian Institute of Population Studies, Mumbai, and a B.Sc. (Physics) degree from the University of Mumbai.

      OP manages NEERMAN's field surveys in the Central and Northern states of India, in the Hindi-speaking belt. He is a veteran with 25 years of extensive field work experience.
      Throughout his career, he has been responsible for the execution of large field studies as part of organizations such as the USAID, the World Bank, UNICEF and CARE India.

      OP holds a Master’s Degree in Economics from Kanpur University.

      Somalee heads the Center for Healthcare Transformation (Heat) which does cutting-edge and technology-driven research in public health systems.

      As a Board-certified Internal Medicine physician practising in California, USA, Somali is involved in healthcare delivery research studying access to care at a large, fully integrated health system. She is experienced in health systems strengthening work in rural and urban settings in India and Malawi.

      She holds an M.D. from Washington University in St. Louis and a Masters in Public Health from the University of California, Berkeley.

      Gus leads the Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Division that focuses on customized client offerings and strategic partnerships.

      Prakash has over 16 years of experience in Research, Monitoring and Evaluation, with an approach of designing, developing strategies and implementation at the field level. He has a diverse measurement expertise in the domains of education, health and nutrition, HIV/AIDS, child rights, WaSH, gender equity, and audience measurement.

      Prakash holds a Master's Degree in Population Studies with a specialization in demography.

      Jijo leads the Growth and Partnerships Division and is responsible for driving business at NEERMAN.

      He has over 9 years of experience in the domains of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), grant management, fundraising for nonprofits, and strategic institutional partnerships.

      Jijo holds a Master's Degree in Economics from the University of Mumbai and a Bachelor's Degree in Economics from St. Xavier's College, Mumbai.

      Nandish manages NEERMAN's research partnerships with international universities and strategic clients within India. He is also the administrative head of our New Delhi Research Office.

      He has over ten years of experience managing research including study design, field management, questionnaire design, data analysis, and liaising with government officials, donors, and civil society organizations.

      Nandish holds a Master's degree in Public Policy from Tufts University, USA, as well as a Master's Degree in Economics from the Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Pune, India.

      A passionate researcher and published writer, Sumeet is the force behind NEERMAN’s research and serves as a Director on NEERMAN's Board.

      Before he founded NEERMAN, Sumeet worked at RTI International as a Senior Economist and at PRESTELS Mumbai as an Executive Engineer. He has also led a World Bank impact evaluation of a sanitation programme as a Staff Consultant.

      Sumeet holds a PhD in Epidemiology from the University of California, Berkeley, and double Masters degrees in Economics and in Environmental Engineering from the NC State University.

      /* ]]> */